Terminating the Employment Relationship

167 Gov. Code, § 31720. 167 Harris v. City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203 [152 Cal.Rptr.3d 392, 294 P.3d 49] 168 Gov. Code, § 21150; Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement System (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 873, 876 [86 Cal.Rptr. 450, 453]. 169 Gov. Code, § 20026, eff. January 1, 2018; CalPERS Circular Letter No: 200-018-017. 170 Gov. Code, § 31720. 170 Harris v. City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203 [152 Cal.Rptr.3d 392, 294 P.3d 49] 171 Sager v. County of Yuba (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 1049, 1057 [68 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 6–7]; Haywood v. American River Fire Protection Dist. (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 1292, 1303–1304 [79 Cal.Rptr.2d 749, 755–757], review den. 172 Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement System (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 873, 876 [86 Cal.Rptr. 450, 453]; Harmon v. Board of Retirement (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 689 [133 Cal.Rptr. 154]. 173 Gov. Code, § 21156 as amended by A.B. 2244 (2006) overruling by statute Nolan v. City of Anaheim (2004) 33 Cal.4th 335 [14 Cal.Rptr.3d 857, 92 P.3d 350], rehg. den. 174 Petrillo v. Bay Area Rapid Transit Dist. (1988) 197 Cal.App.3d 798, 812 [243 Cal.Rptr. 74, 82], rehg. den.; Harmon v. Board of Retirement (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 689, 697 [133 Cal.Rptr. 154, 161]. 175 Pearl v. W.C.A.B. (2001) 26 Cal.4th 189, 195 [109 Cal.Rptr.2d 308, 312, 26 P.3d 1044, 1048]. 176 Hosford v. Board of Administration (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 854 [143 Cal.Rptr. 760]. 177 Wolfman v. Board of Trustees (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 787 [196 Cal.Rptr. 395], applying PERS disability law. 178 Hosford v. Board of Administration (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 854, 860 [143 Cal.Rptr. 760, 764]. 179 Sager v. County of Yuba (2007) 156 Cal.App.4th 1049, 1057 [68 Cal.Rptr.3d 1, 6–7]. 180 Gov. Code, § 1031, subd. (f). 181 Hosford v. Board of Administration (1978) 77 Cal.App.3d 854, 860–861 [143 Cal.Rptr. 760, 764–765]. 182 Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement System (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 873, 876–877 [86 Cal.Rptr. 450, 451–452] [fish and game warden denied disability retirement despite restriction from heavy lifting because the warden could carry out his normal duties (i.e. supervising the hunting and fishing of ordinary citizens) and the need for heavy lifting was not a common occurrence (e.g. physically strenuous arrests, lifting a deer)]. 183 Thelander v. City of El Monte (1983) 147 Cal.App.3d 736, 742 [195 Cal.Rptr. 318, 320–321] [distinguishing Mansperger v. Public Employees' Retirement System (1970) 6 Cal.App.3d 873 [86 Cal.Rptr. 450]; city police officer was entitled to disability retirement where she was restricted in her ability to subdue violent suspects, engage in a foot chase, quell a disturbance, break up a fight, or drag or carry a victim out of danger, when the city required all officers to be ready, willing and able to perform these duties regardless of assignment]. 184 Stuessel v. City of Glendale (1983) 141 Cal.App.3d 1047, 1051 [190 Cal.Rptr. 773, 775–776]; Harmon v. Board of Retirement (1976) 62 Cal.App.3d 689, 695 [133 Cal.Rptr. 154, 159–160]. 185 Gov. Code, § 31725.5. 186 Wolfman v. Board of Trustees (1983) 148 Cal.App.3d 787 [196 Cal.Rptr. 395]. 187 Gov. Code, § 20026. 188 Gov. Code, § 20026, eff. January 1, 2018; CalPERS Circular Letter No: 200-018-017. 189 Gov. Code, § 21190. 190 Gov. Code, § 31720, review den. 190 Harris v. City of Santa Monica (2013) 56 Cal.4th 203 [152 Cal.Rptr.3d 392, 294 P.3d 49] 191 CalPERS Circular Letter No: 200-018-017.

Terminating the Employment Relationship ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 137