Privacy Issues in the Workplace

416 Welsh v. City and County of San Francisco (N.D. Cal. 1995) 887 F.Supp. 1293. 417 Michael v. Gates (1995) 38 Cal.App.4th 737 [45 Cal.Rptr.2d 163].

418 Commission on Peace Officer Standards & Training v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 278 [64 Cal.Rptr.3d 661]; International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers Local 21, AFL-CIO v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 319 [64 Cal.Rptr.3d 693]. 419 International Federation of Professional and Technical Engineers, Local 21, AFL-CIO v. Superior Court (2007) 42 Cal.4th 319 [64 Cal.Rptr.3d 693]. 420 Ortega v. O’Connor (9th Cir. 1985) 764 F.2d 703, revd. (1987) 480 U.S. 709 [107 S.Ct. 1492]. 421 O’Connor v. Ortega (1987) 480 U.S. 709 [107 S.Ct. 1492], affd. (9th Cir. 1998) 146 F.3d 1149. 422 Ortega v. O’Connor (9th Cir. 1998) 146 F.3d 1149, 1166. 423 City of Ontario, Cal. v. Quon (2010) 560 U.S. 746 [130 S.Ct. 2619], distinguished by (2011) 770 F.Supp.2d 1042.

424 Crispin v. Christian Audigier, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2010) 717 F.Supp.2d 965. 425 Riley v. California (2014) 134 S.Ct. 2473, cert. den. (2015) 136 S.Ct. 506.

426 Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531. 427 Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531, 556.

428 Gov. Code, § 3309. 429 Gov. Code, § 3259. 430 Los Angeles Police Protective League v. Gates (9th Cir. 1993) 995 F.2d 1469.

431 O’Connor v. Ortega (1987) 480 U.S. 709 [107 S.Ct. 1492], affd. (9th Cir. 1998) 146 F.3d 1149. 432 Finkelstein v. State Personnel Bd . (1990) 218 Cal.App.3d 264 [267 Cal.Rptr. 133], review den . 433 Katz v. United States (1967) 389 U.S. 347 [88 S.Ct. 507], superseded by statute (N.M. 2011) 150 N. M. 721. 434 Haynes v. Office of Atty Gen. Phill Kline (10th Cir. 2003) 298 F.Supp.2d 1154. 435 O’Conner v. Ortega (1987) 480 U.S. 709 [107 S.Ct. 1492]. 436 O’Conner v. Ortega (1987) 480 U.S. 709, 717, 724 [107 S.Ct. 1492]. 437 18 U.S.C. §§ 2510-2520 (Prior version's limitation on the meaning of the word “intercept” recognized by In re Pharmatrak, Inc. (1st Cir. 2003) 329 F.3d 9, 20.). 438 18 U.S.C § 2511, subd. (1) (Section 2511(1)(a) is unconstitutional as applied by Hutton v. Woodall (D. Colorado 2014) 70 F.Supp.3d 1235, 1240 due to the absence of a federal nexus.). 439 Hutton v. Woodall (D. Colorado 2014) 70 F.Supp.3d 1235, 1240. 440 18 U.S.C. § 2701, subd. (a)(1). 441 Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc . (9th Cir. 2008) 529 F.3d 892, 900, revd. & remanded (2010) 560 U.S. 746 [130 S.Ct. 2619], distinguished by (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1047 [119 Cal.Rptr.3d 878] (provision cited for still good law). 442 Quon v. Arch Wireless Operating Co., Inc. (9th Cir. 2008) 529 F.3d 892, revd. & remanded (2010) 560 U.S. 746 [130 S.Ct. 2619], distinguished by (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1047 [119 Cal.Rptr.3d 878]. 443 City of Ontario, Cal. v. Quon (2010) 560 U.S. 746 [130 S.Ct. 2619], distinguished by (2011) 770 F.Supp.2d 1047 [119 Cal.Rptr.3d 878]. 444 Watkins v. L. M. Berry & Co. (11th Cir. 1983) 704 F.2d 577.

Privacy Issues in the Workplace ©2021 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 202