Privacy Issues in the Workplace

or former employer of the applicant to, and upon request of, one whom the employer reasonably believes is a prospective employer of the applicant. This subdivision authorizes a current or former employer, or the employer’s agent, to answer whether or not the employer would rehire a current or former employee.

Thus, the issue is whether the former employer had credible information to support its statement to the prospective employer, and whether it acted with malice.

An employer should only give a reference if two criteria are met; 1) the reference is honest, and 2) the employer can prove it is honest. An employee may have been lazy, but if there is no performance evaluation, counseling memo, written warning or other documentation memorializing the employee’s laziness, the employer will have a difficult time showing that it had credible information that will trigger the protection of Section 47(c). If an employer has credible information to support a job reference, it will normally be protected from any civil tort claims.

Note that a waiver, while recommended, may not prove to be an absolute bar to liability.

McQuirk v. Donnelley 128 The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals interpreting California law, held that a County and its Sheriff were not immune from liability (despite a signed release) for providing a reference to a prospective employer for a former employee. Philip McQuirk was a former employee of the Glenn County, California Sheriff’s Office. Five years after receiving a medical retirement from Glenn County, he applied for a non-peace officer position with the Mountlake Terrace Police Department in Washington State. McQuirk signed a release that authorized former employers to provide information regarding him, his work record, his reputation, and his financial status and waived liability for compliance. McQuirk, was hired on April 11, 1995. On April 12, 1995, Commander Smith of the Mountlake Terrace Police Department spoke with Louis Donnelley, Glenn County Sheriff, regarding McQuirk. McQuirk alleges that Donnelley made five defamatory statements about him during that conversation. McQuirk’s offer was rescinded. McQuirk filed a lawsuit in Washington against Donnelley and Glenn County, seeking damages and injunctive relief for defamation. The Court granted the County’s motion for summary judgment. McQuirk appealed. The Court of Appeals reversed. Interpreting the law in the way it believed the California Supreme Court would, the Court held that pursuant to Civil Code section 1668, the waiver signed by McQuirk was invalid as it improperly shielded Donnelley from liability for intentional torts. In addition, the Court held that Donnelley was not immune from liability under Government Code section 820.2, which provides immunity for public officials for discretionary acts. The Court held that Donnelley’s conduct in making the statements to

Privacy Issues in the Workplace ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 42