Privacy Issues in the Workplace

456 People v. Childs (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1079 [164 Cal.Rptr.3d 287], review den. 457 People v. Childs (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1079 [164 Cal.Rptr.3d 287], review den. 458 People v. Childs (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1079 [164 Cal.Rptr.3d 287], review den. 459 People v. Childs (2013) 220 Cal.App.4th 1079 [164 Cal.Rptr.3d 287], review den. 460 Pen. Code, §§ 630 et seq . 461 Pen. Code, § 631 ( Recognized as unconstitutional by unpublished decision People v. Algire (2013) 165 Cal.Rptr.3d 650 ). 462 Pen. Code, § 632 (Unconstitutional as applied by People v. Guzman (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 184 (where Proposition 8 abrogated its application in criminal proceedings where the exclusion rule is invoked to suppress relevant evidence) (review granted).) 463 Warden v. Kahn (1979) 99 Cal.App.3d 805 [160 Cal.Rptr. 471], distinguished by In re Facebook Internet Tracking Litigation 140 F.Supp.3d 922 (N.D.Cal. 2015).. 464 Pen. Code, § 637. 465 TBG Insurance Services Corp. v. Superior Court (2002) 96 Cal.App.4th 443 [117 Cal.Rptr.2d 155], rehg. & review den. 466 Lab. Code, § 980, subd. (a). 467 See Calif. Penal Code, §§ 632 (Unconstitutional as applied by People v. Guzman (2017) 11 Cal.App.5th 184 (where Proposition 8 abrogated its application in criminal proceedings where the exclusion rule is invoked to suppress relevant evidence) (review granted)), and 633. 468 Telish v. California State Personnel Bd. (2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 1479 [184 Cal. Rptr. 3d 873], as mod. 469 Pen. Code, §§ 1546.1, subd. (a)(1)-(3). 470 Intel Corp. v. Hamidi (2003) 30 Cal.4th 1342 [1 Cal.Rptr.3d 32]. 471 Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, ALF-CIO , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA- 095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (December 11, 2014) and on remand Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO Supplemental Decision , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA- 095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (March 16, 2015) and supplemental decision to adopt recommended Order Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO Supplemental Decision , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA-095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (March 24, 2017). 472 Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, ALF-CIO , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA- 095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (December 11, 2014) and on remand Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO Supplemental Decision , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA- 095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (March 16, 2015) and supplemental decision to adopt recommended Order Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO Supplemental Decision , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA-095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (March 24, 2017) . 473 Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, ALF-CIO , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA- 095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (December 11, 2014) and on remand Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO Supplemental Decision , N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA- 095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (March 16, 2015) and supplemental decision to adopt recommended Order Purple Communications, Inc. and Communications Workers of America, AFL-CIO Supplemental Decision, N.L.R.B. Case Nos. 21-CA-095151, 21-RC-091531, and 21-RC-091584 (March 24, 2017) . 474 Holmes v. Petrovich Development Company (2011) 191 Cal.App.4th 1047 [119 Cal.Rptr.3d 878].

Privacy Issues in the Workplace ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 194