Privacy Issues in the Workplace

287 49 C.F.R. § 40.25. 288 49 C.F.R. § 40.25.

289 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (a). 290 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (b). 291 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (c). 292 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (d). 293 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (e). 294 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (f). 295 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (h). 296 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (g). 297 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (g). 298 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (i). 299 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (i). 300 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (j). 301 49 C.F.R. § 40.25, subd. (j).

302 Craig v. Municipal Court (1979) 100 Cal.App.3d 69 [161 Cal.Rptr. 19]. 303 Britt v. Superior Court (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844 [143 Cal.Rptr. 695].

304 Board of Trustees v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 516 [174 Cal.Rptr. 160] (Disapproved of by Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531, 557 fn. 8, where California Supreme Court held that while this and other cases may have been correct to require a compelling interest or compelling need and many of the cases made the correct ultimate conclusion as to whether the information should or should not have been discoverable, this and other cases were disapproved for assuming, without conducting the inquiry Hill requires, that a compelling interest or compelling need was automatically required.) ; see also Pomona College v. Superior Court (1996) 45 Cal.App.4th 1716 [53 Cal.Rptr.2d 662]. 305 Aguilar v. Johnson (1988) 202 Cal.App.3d 241, 249 [247 Cal.Rptr. 909, 913]. 306 Gov. Code, § 3255. 307 Board of Trustees v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 516 [174 Cal.Rptr. 160] (Disapproved of by Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531, 557 fn. 8, where California Supreme Court held that while this and other cases may have been correct to require a compelling interest or compelling need and many of the cases made the correct ultimate conclusion as to whether the information should or should not have been discoverable, this and other cases were disapproved for assuming, without conducting the inquiry Hill requires, that a compelling interest or compelling need was automatically required.). 308 Brutsch v. City of Los Angeles (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 354 [4 Cal.Rptr.2d 456], review den. 309 Board of Trustees v. Superior Court (1981) 119 Cal.App.3d 516 [174 Cal.Rptr. 160] (Disapproved of by Williams v. Superior Court (2017) 3 Cal.5th 531, 557 fn. 8, where California Supreme Court held that while this and other cases may have been correct to require a compelling interest or compelling need and many of the cases made the correct ultimate conclusion as to whether the information should or should not have been discoverable, this and other cases were disapproved for assuming, without conducting the inquiry Hill requires, that a compelling interest or compelling need was automatically required.). 310 Brutsch v. City of Los Angeles (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 354 [4 Cal.Rptr.2d 456], review den. 311 Brutsch v. City of Los Angeles (1992) 3 Cal.App.4th 354, 360 [4 Cal.Rptr.2d 456, 459], review den.

Privacy Issues in the Workplace ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 188