Privacy Issues in the Workplace

235 Civ. Code, § 56.10, subd. (b) & (c). 236 Civ. Code, § 56.20, subd. (c)(4). 237 Civ. Code, § 56.05, subd. (g). 238 Civ. Code, § 56.05, subd. (g). 239 Civ. Code, § 56.11. 240 Civ. Code, § 56.10, subd. (b) & (c). 241 Civ. Code, § 56.20, subd. (d).

242 45 C.F.R. § 160.103. 243 45 C.F.R. § 164.103. 244 45 C.F.R. § 164.530. 245 Civ. Code, § 56.20, subd. (c). 246 Cal. Code Regs., tit. 8, § 3204, subd. (e)(1)(A). 247 Code Civ. Proc., § 1985.3. 248 Code Civ. Proc., § 1985.3, subd. (b). 249 Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., rule 45, subd. (c)(2)(B). 250 Fed. Rules Civ.Proc., rule 45, subd. (c)(3).

251 Gov. Code, §§ 6250 et seq . 252 Gov. Code, § 6254, subd. (c). 253 Gov. Code, § 6253, subd. (c).

254 Pen. Code, § 832.7. (Constitutional limitations of Penal Code section 832.7 resolved in People v. Superior Court (2015) 61 Cal.4th 696, 723, where the prosecution must comply with the procedures of Pitchess if it wishes to obtain information from confidential peace officer personnel records, and fulfills its Brady obligation if it then shares with the defendant any information it has regarding whether the personnel records contain Brady material. The defendant can then decide whether to file his/her own Pitchess motion.). 255 Evid. Code, § 1043. 256 E.E.O.C. v. County of San Benito (N.D.Cal., 1993) 818 F.Supp. 289; Soto v. City of Concord (N.D.Cal., 1995) 162 F.R.D. 603; Pen. Code, § 832.7. (Constitutional limitations of Penal Code section 832.7 resolved in People v. Superior Court (2015) 61 Cal.4th 696, 723, where the prosecution must comply with the procedures of Pitchess if it wishes to obtain information from confidential peace officer personnel records, and fulfills its Brady obligation if it then shares with the defendant any information it has regarding whether the personnel records contain Brady material. The defendant can then decide whether to file his/her own Pitchess motion.). 257 Garrett v. Young (2003) 109 Cal.App.4th 1393 [1 Cal.Rptr.3d 134]. 258 Pettus v. Cole (1996) 49 Cal.App.4th 402, 442-43 [57 Cal.Rptr.2d 46, 73-74], as mod. on den. of rehg., review den. 259 Shaddox v. Bertani (2003) 110 Cal.App.4th 1406 [2 Cal.Rptr.3d 808], rehg. den. 260 Loder v. City of Glendale (1997) 14 Cal.4th 846 [59 Cal.Rptr.2d 696], cert. den. 522 U.S. 807 [118 S.Ct. 44]. 261 Leonel v. American Airlines, Inc. (9th Cir. 2005) 400 F.3d 702, 709, opn. amended on den. of rehg. (9th Cir. 2005) 2005 WL 976985.

Privacy Issues in the Workplace ©2019 (s) Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 186