An Administrator's Guide to California Private School Law

420 Joanou v. Coca-Cola Co. (9th Cir. 1994) 26 F.3d 96, 100. 421 Stokes v. Dole Nut Co. (1995) 41 Cal.App.4th 285, 293–295 [48 Cal.Rptr.2d 673]. 422 Paylor v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co. (11th Cir. 2014) 748 F.3d 1117. 423 Drzewiecki v. H & R Block, Inc. (1972) 24 Cal.App.3d 695, 705 [101 Cal.Rptr. 169, 175]. 424 Civ. Code, § 1654. 425 Quicken Loans, Inc. (Mar. 17, 2016) 2016 WL 1072075. 426 Civ. Code, § 3344. 427 Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 117 [99 Cal.Rptr.2d 745, 770, 6 P.3d 669]. 428 Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc. (2003) 29 Cal.4th 1064, 1072–1073 [130 Cal.Rptr.2d 892, 898, 63 P.3d 979] on remand to Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App., June 12, 2003, No. B147003) 2003 WL 21357214, and cert. den. by (2003) 540 U.S. 818 [124 S.Ct. 83](provision allowing judicial review of awards that exceeded $50,000 was found to be unconscionable because, as a practical matter, this broader scope of review would be available only for awards against employers; awards against employees were unlikely to exceed this amount). 429 Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. (9th Cir. 2003) 328 F.3d 1165, 1175, cert. den. by (9th Cir. 2004) 540 U.S. 1160 [124 S.Ct. 1169] and on subsequent appeal Ingle v. Circuit City (9th Cir. 2005) 408 F.3d 592 (one year period to demand arbitration was found unconscionable because it deprived the employee of the opportunity to make a continuing violation claim under the FEHA). 430 Ingle v. Circuit City Stores, Inc. (9th Cir. 2003) 328 F.3d 1165, 1179 and on subsequent appeal Ingle v. Circuit City (9th Cir. 2005) 408 F.3d 592. 431 Hooters of America, Inc. v. Phillips (4th Cir. 1999) 173 F.3d 933, 939. 432 Pinela v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc. (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 227, 245 [190 Cal.Rptr.3d 159, 175]; Tiri v. Lucky Chances, Inc. (2014) 226 Cal.App.4th 231, 249 [171 Cal.Rptr.3d 621, 635]. 433 Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. Superior Court (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 71 [82 Cal.Rptr.3d 154, 162] (previously published at Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. Superior Court (2008) 166 Cal.App.4th 71, 83 [82 Cal.Rptr.3d 154]), revd. on other grounds Pearson Dental Supplies, Inc. v. Superior Court (2010) 48 Cal.4th 665 [108 Cal.Rptr.3d 171, 229 P.3d 83], (court declined to decide whether the arbitration agreement was unconscionable due to the limitations provision). 434 Ferguson v. Countrywide Credit Industries, Inc. (9th Cir. 2002) 298 F.3d 778, 786–787. 435 Davis v. O'Melveny & Myers (9th Cir. 2007) 485 F.3d 1066, 1078–1079, cert. dismissed by (2008) 552 U.S. 1161 [128 S.Ct. 1117], disapproved on another ground in Ferguson v. Corinthian Colleges, Inc. (9th Cir. 2013) 733 F.3d 928, 933–934. 436 Armendariz v. Foundation Health Psychcare Services, Inc. (2000) 24 Cal.4th 83, 103–104 [99 Cal.Rptr.2d 745, 768, 6 P.3d 669]. 437 Lucas v. Gund, Inc. (C.D. Cal. 2006) 450 F.Supp.2d 1125, 1134. 438 Sparks v. Vista Del Mar Child & Family Services (2012) 207 Cal.App.4th 1511, 1520 [145 Cal.Rptr.3d 318], as mod. on den. of rehg. (Aug. 20, 2012), contra Harris v. TAP Worldwide, LLC (2016) 248 Cal.App.4th 373, 386 [203 Cal.Rptr.3d 522, 532]. 439 Esparza v. Sand & Sea, Inc. (2016) 2 Cal.App.5th 781 [206 Cal.Rptr.3d 474]. 440 Pinnacle Museum Tower Assn. v. Pinnacle Market Development (US), LLC (2012) 55 Cal.4th 223, 247 [145 Cal.Rptr.3d 514, 532, 282 P.3d 1217]. 441 Bigler v. Harker School (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 727, 737 [153 Cal.Rptr.3d 78, 86]. 442 Madden v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals (1976) 17 Cal.3d 699, 713–714 [131 Cal.Rptr. 882, 552 P.2d 1178]; City of Vista v. Sutro & Co. (1997) 52 Cal.App.4th 401, 411 [60 Cal.Rptr.2d 488].

An Administrator’s Guide to California Private School Law ©2019 Liebert Cassidy Whitmore 673